Stinger32LND asked over 2 years ago
Suggestion for improvement
What do you think of locking the rating given after contract expires? This would prevent retaliation to a node if they close after completion date.
7 Comments
LN+ Admin wrote over 2 years ago
Thanks for the ideas and kind words
LN+ Admin wrote over 2 years ago
Yes. The rating rules will be improved. I’m collecting suggestions from node operators to make it as fair and useful as possible.
Shire_Society_Federation wrote over 2 years ago
The current system is good because it is easy to understand and addresses the value transfer.
i.e. Opening and keeping open the channel gives value from one side, the positive rating gives value from the other side.
i.e. Opening and keeping open the channel gives value from one side, the positive rating gives value from the other side.
Stinger32LND wrote over 2 years ago
I like the rating system. What I would like to see is the happy/sad rating be locked after the contract period has lapsed.
Shire_Society_Federation wrote over 2 years ago
What if the unhappy person gets a settlement to remove their rating?
I think the bigger problem is potential peers can't easily check which swap caused the negative ratings.
I think the bigger problem is potential peers can't easily check which swap caused the negative ratings.
Stinger32LND wrote over 2 years ago
Sounds like something to workshop. I really enjoy the service provided by the website and what you are doing for the community.
Roger
Roger
casa wrote over 2 years ago
Yes, +1 for this idea.
Please login to post comments.